What I would like to know is less than what ailments the strain spikes ended up discovered. Was it since the plastic 410 wads turned tricky with the chilly? Has everyone tried it while in the Hornet beginning with 2400 data?
Concerning migrating 296, I make use of the Spolar furnished rubber gromet beneath an following market place pyrodex powder tube from SGW member skeeljc and there is little or no powder migration with my #405 Spolar.
Also, ensure that you set the crimper around crimp into the depth of a couple of dime, and be sure you are only marginally taper crimping the hulls.
If you're reloading within the 1200fps array isntead, then your better off Along with the #296 powder rather (slightly quicker melt away amount, so a slightly better burn off at the slower speeds/pressures alternatively). Hell, acquire is a single action farther, and When you are within the 1200fps array in 410, much better off with lil gun or 410 powder, since they've got a cleaner burn off at these speeds, because they've a higher Doing work tension at these speeds rather (melt away in the #294-#295 burn assortment isntead, and this kind of powder burns to speedy to obtain you to the 1350fps vary to start with because you will dancing/flirty with max Operating pressures isntead).
This really is an more mature thread, you might not get a response, and could be reviving an aged thread. You should think about making a new thread.
So 296/297 at 1200fps leaves a great deal of unburnt powder during the bore, even though the speedier/higher Operating stress loads true finally ends up with much less unburnt powder inside the bores isntead.
This is certainly kinda "Innovative reloading one zero one" and can be achieved upon getting a grasp of What's going on at the beginning amount.
In this post, we’ll discover the Houses and applications of Accurate 1680 Powder, and why it’s a top option for discerning marksmen.
I have nonetheless to try 300MP, but from all stories it's a high-quality 410 powder. I moved to W-296/H-a hundred and ten a number of yrs ago, for a similar good reasons that Bob states. Higher velocities with lessen pressures. It addresses this industry nicely, and with Superb case life.
This is certainly an more mature thread, you may not get a reaction, and could be reviving an old thread. Make sure you look at developing a new thread.
At Ibericafé we provide our collaborators with complex experiences in this contact form regards to the evolution on the markets.
Despite the fact that I haven't tried using it I concur using your imagining on the four ball load, seems like the exact same problem as I Formerly outlined by using a 5 pellet load of OOO buck.
They're telling it like it reall is. During the 410, there's no superior propellant than H110/W296. It can get you the highest important site velocities, with pressures within just cause and is particularly far much easier on instances than other powders and Alliant 410 is particularly hard on AA HS situations.